2/18/13

Notes From Peace Demonstrations: John Fortier Peace Vigil, 2/15/13

Dear Reader, Korean War veteran and retired school teacher John Fortier, who is also a husband, father, grandfather and great-grandfather, has conducted a peace vigil each Friday along a busy Pacific Coast Highway street corner in Redondo Beach, CA since March, 2003.

He began that peace vigil to protest a war President George W. Bush was about to launch in Iraq, a war that would become an absolute disaster, costing hundreds of thousands of men, women and children their lives and destroying Iraq.

Yet for nearly 10 years of peace vigils, John has often been out on that street corner to the naked eye very much alone. It takes real courage and principle to do what John does.

In last Friday's vigil, John tells the story of a man whose brother's life was destroyed by Post Traumatic Stress Disorder from the Vietnam War, another U.S. disaster.

But like so many other wars the U.S. now fights, people are left to bury their dead, find homes for their orphans and do so without a trace, and without any assessment by the American people as to whether all the violence made any sense. The Afghanistan War is an excellent example. Thousands of people dead in this 11 year old war and nothing to show for it, and no-one held accountable. Yet this war continues to be fought.

John writes with a homespun feel that makes his writings interesting to read, yet he writes of the ugliness of war, something he saw first hand in Korea. By contrast, the last two U.S. presidents, Obama and Bush who triggered all of the current violence, like me, have never been to war, never had to witness all the death and destruction.

Here is John's description of last Friday's vigil:

Friday
Last ^ night had an unusual but not unique element, its motivation. From the top, it goes like this.

About 4:30 a nicely casually dressed gent about 50 comes walking briskly from the parking lot on Knob Hill to my corner at PCH. He has a digital-camera-phone in hand, so I'm guessing he might be interested in picture taking. I'm tempted to offer or invite him to take pictures,
but there is a very real possibility that that is not his intention and , not wanting to seem to him a real narcissistic ego-tripper, I just sit. And wait.

"Would you mind if I took your picture?" he asks.

"If I don't have to disrobe, and if the signs are in focus and prominent, help yourself," I recite my usual sophomoric excuse for a more mature and civil, " Not at all, feel free, please."

I said it was unusual but not unique; here's why. Remember last year a high school journalism group visited us on the corner, interviewed and recorded us, and put the result on the high school site/blog? And then last week a lady took some pictures for a contest she had entered? And a few people have snapped shots from passing cars too. Right ?




So, though definitely not unique, last night was singular in that it is part of this man's homage to his brother who has been ravaged and wrecked by PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder). The fellow's name is Emile, and he is on a quest to arouse awareness, concern, and outrage about PTSD and the totally inadequate band aid approach to treatment he feels is currently being given.


He said he had driven by the corner, noticing my signs and me many times and kept thinking about stopping but never quite could bring himself to do it. What finally decided him was the irony of the big handsome city sign behind me, and very readable by southbound traffic, that says in part - 'Vietnam Veteran's Memorial . . .' His brother is a Vietnam vet, and the fact that I, a vet of the previous war (Korea, for you youngsters) that was also an absolute failure, am sitting in front of a sign referring to his brother's war, an even more disastrous failure - he groped for words at times about how wrong, how obviously wrong and stupid it has all been. We talked about how, despite money by the ton wasted, lost or stolen, civilian family and friends had to buy better head gear protection against roadside bomb damage. Rumsfeld was right. He said you don't go to war with the army you want; you go to war with the army you've got. The third possibility, of course, that never occurred to that evil ego-maniac, was to not go to war at all.


He left about 5:15 and plans to return earlier this coming Friday to chat some more and maybe get some better pictures in better light. It's a little embarrassing and awkward talking with him about his brother and the damages he suffered, since he was a foot soldier down in the mud and the blood. When my pilot took me on a mission, I was wearing clean socks and shorts, and I came back the same way, got a crew member chow pass and went and got a steak dinner, whatever time it was. It's hard to believe we were on the same side of the same stupid war business


If he gets his blog thing going, I'll put the name out there so folks who are interested can take a look.


A mutual friend of Dick and mine, Grant by name, came by shortly after Emile left. He hung around till almost 6 talking about Emile's problems and plans and the probable hopelessness of his case. It was a sad way to end a sad evening.

No comments: